You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've seen this twice now where Lariat aligned BAMs contain alignments where the SA tag reports a position of -1. (For an example, see hall-lab/extract_sv_reads#8). My expectation was that the position in the SA tag is 1-based, although the specification is not explicit on this point. For BWA-MEM aligned BAMs, I've never encountered a negative position in this tag.
Since it's unclear to me, I thought I'd open an issue to ask what a position of -1 means in the SA tags for Lariat aligned BAMs?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've seen this twice now where Lariat aligned BAMs contain alignments where the SA tag reports a position of -1. (For an example, see hall-lab/extract_sv_reads#8). My expectation was that the position in the SA tag is 1-based, although the specification is not explicit on this point. For BWA-MEM aligned BAMs, I've never encountered a negative position in this tag.
Since it's unclear to me, I thought I'd open an issue to ask what a position of -1 means in the SA tags for Lariat aligned BAMs?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: