Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test using tifffile directly for imread/imsave #11

Open
tlancon opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Test using tifffile directly for imread/imsave #11

tlancon opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tlancon
Copy link
Contributor

tlancon commented Apr 28, 2020

Allows more control over handling metadata and can fix issue with 2D+T

@tlancon tlancon added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 28, 2020
@tlancon
Copy link
Contributor Author

tlancon commented Apr 28, 2020

Potential to fix #12

tlancon added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2020
Switched to importing imread and imsave from tifffile instead of skimage #11
@tlancon
Copy link
Contributor Author

tlancon commented Apr 28, 2020

For cases like AdjustGamma.py, skimage's imread/imsave work just fine since multiple cases don't have to be handled explicitly. It makes sense, however, to switch to using tifffile's imread/imsave for all recipes so that potential users can avoid the confusion of seeing import statements from multiple libraries for the same task. Interested in your thoughts @pmascalchi

seismonastic pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2020
Switched to importing imread and imsave from tifffile instead of skimage #11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant