You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to this paper, the tangent vector is defined to be a constant multiple of the difference vector between the two adjacent points. The constant is called "a".
The basis matrix is then derived from this specification.
It looks like it can only be defined for the uniform case?
In the uniform case, a tension value of a = 0.5 produces a Catmull-Rom spline.
Cardinal splines are Catmull-Rom splines with an additional tension parameter.
This is very similar to Kochanek-Bartels splines, which also have a tension parameter (plus continuity and bias).
So it might not be worth to create a separate notebook for this spline type.
Confusingly, old publications (like e.g. Schoenberg's papers and De Boor's book) use the term "cardinal" to describe "uniform" splines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: