You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is questionable whether an rdfs:Class can be equivalent to a skos:ConceptScheme (even if the members are the same)—I was talking to one of the authors of SKOS last week, he called it "unorthodox to say the least".
I think schema:isBasedOn would be a better term to express the relationship, i.e. ceterms:ActionStatus schema:isBasedOn schema:ActionStatusType
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For ceterms:ActionStatus we have:
owl:equivalentClass schema:ActionStatus ;
Two problems:
I think schema:isBasedOn would be a better term to express the relationship, i.e.
ceterms:ActionStatus schema:isBasedOn schema:ActionStatusType
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: