Use the the Bibliographic Ontology for BIOfid ontologies

[Archilegt]

We should use the Bibliographic Ontology in the EUdaphobase Taxonomy Ontology, the Chilopoda Anatomy Ontology, and the Diplopoda Anatomy Ontology. I have recommend the same for the Soil Food Web Ontology.
Additional resources:
Bibliographic Ontology Specification
Bibliographic-Ontology-BIBO on GitHub

Part of what I am doing for the ontologies is to expand existing terms with additional definitions and sources. That is why it is important to formalize the structure of the sources.

BIBO example for a standard journal article:
The article is directly linked to its journal. The ordered author list is represented using an rdf:List.

<info:doi/10.1134/S0003683806040089> a bibo:Article ;
    dc:title "Effect of argillaceous minerals on the growth of phosphate-mobilizing bacteria Bacillus subtilis"@en ;
    dc:date "2006-01-01" ;
    dc:isPartOf <urn:issn:23346587> ;
    bibo:volume "42" ;
    bibo:issue "4" ;
    bibo:pageStart "388" ;
    bibo:pageEnd "391" ;
    dc:creator <http://examples.net/contributors/2> ;
    dc:creator <http://examples.net/contributors/1> ;
    bibo:authorList ( <http://examples.net/contributors/2> <http://examples.net/contributors/1>) .

<urn:issn:23346587> a bibo:Journal ;
    dc:title "Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology"@en ;
    bibo:shortTitle "App Biochem and Biol"@en .