You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently AN offers autolinkage between "float" and "vector/euler" with combine node. (or "Vector from value" node particularly for "scale")
But this function doesn't seem working for "float list", even if many nodes are vectorized and working through mannual linking.
I mainly tested with "float range"/"create a float list" and "object transform output", "offset matrices" node.
Sometimes I only need to effect certain axis only, using a float to control will improve UI of loop/group/viewport input node, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
But in this case, should we add a Combine Vector node or a Vector From Value node?
Sorry, I don't understand the question.
The current setup in AN is that for "location/translation", a float will generate a "combine vector" node.
but for "scale", it will generate a "vector from value" node.
I don't exactly know whether such an autolinkage is specific to type of input or each node itself, but my expectation is just to allow "float list" do the same behavior as what "float" is doing right now in AN.
Currently AN offers autolinkage between "float" and "vector/euler" with combine node. (or "Vector from value" node particularly for "scale")
But this function doesn't seem working for "float list", even if many nodes are vectorized and working through mannual linking.
I mainly tested with "float range"/"create a float list" and "object transform output", "offset matrices" node.
Sometimes I only need to effect certain axis only, using a float to control will improve UI of loop/group/viewport input node, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: