-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Model_Development_v02.R
584 lines (478 loc) · 23.6 KB
/
Model_Development_v02.R
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
######################################
## Model Building
## Evaluation of several classification algorithms
######################################
library(tidyverse)
library(magrittr)
library(lubridate)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(yardstick) #Tidy Characterizations of Model Performance
library(caret) #Classification And REgrassion Trainning
# detach("package:MASS", unload = TRUE)
wildfires <- read.csv('trabajo/wildfires.csv',row.names = 1 )
# First, reorder the features
detach("package:MASS", unload = TRUE) #necessary to avoid confusion with the select
wildfires %<>% select(c(X, Y, Square, Municipality, Day, Month, Year, Duration,FarmingArea, ForestalTotalArea, Cause))
wildfires$Cause <- as.factor(wildfires$Cause)
wildfires %<>% mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.factor))
str(wildfires)
##########################################################################################Intro####
# Based on the models from the book: ISL, I will compare the following classification models:
# -Linear Discriminant Analysis
# -Random Forest
# -Boosting
# -Extreme Gradient Boosting
# Then I will add an additional models:
# -KNN
######################################################################################Procedure####
# Using Nested CV is important when the sample size is small and when the choice of tuning
# parameters is difficult. (For example, different seeds, different "best.tune"")
# In Nested CV we separate parameter tuning of the models from choosing between the
# models. The models also compete using the same folds of the data.
# Thus, due to the size of this dataset, the best option is to use a Nested Cross-Validation
# approach to train and validate the models with the different combinations of hyperparameters
# Lastly use a test set to compare the best performing model of each algorithm.
dim(wildfires) #678 13
# I take the most frequent category as the precision threshold to accept a model
mean('Arson' == wildfires$Cause) # 0.3938053
# In order to replicate my results I set a random seed.
set.seed(20012021)
# Train/Test Split:
train_index = sample(nrow(wildfires), nrow(wildfires)*0.75)
train = wildfires[train_index,]
test = wildfires[-train_index,]
# Split train in 5 folds
ntrain = nrow(train)
train.folds = createFolds(train$Cause,k=5,returnTrain=TRUE) #5 different boxes of the training data
# returnTrain=T returns 5 groups of 4/5 of the data to do training
valid.fold = lapply(train.folds,function(x) (1:ntrain)[-x]) #
# Train Control adding one first layer of CV
fitControl <- trainControl(method = 'cv', number = 5, summaryFunction=defaultSummary)
##################################LDA####
## Linear Discriminative Analysis
######################################
# In the text book ISL with R the Logit for multi-class is not covered giving
# more importance to the LDA for that matter then this will be the first model.
# I only used the numeric variables for the LDA, so I change the two factors for numbers.
# Also as there is some correlation I performed a PCA in order to remove variables collineality
# and keep all information.
lda.wildfires = wildfires %>% mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric))
lda.train = train %>% mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric))
# across(Cause, as.character))
lda.test = test %>% mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric))
# across(Cause, as.character))
varcor = cor(lda.wildfires[,-11])
which(abs(varcor)>0.75 & varcor!=1)
pca.train = prcomp(lda.train[,-11], scale=TRUE)
biplot(pca.train, scale=0, xlim=c(-1,3), ylim=c(-4,4))
pca.train$sdev -> pcsd
# Amount of variation each component captures
ggplot(data=as.data.frame(pcsd), aes(pcsd, x=1:10))+
geom_line(color='green2') + geom_point() +
geom_hline(yintercept=1, linetype='dashed', color='red') +
ggtitle('Screen Plot',subtitle = "Variation captured by principal component") +
xlab('PCs') + ylab('St. Dev.') +
theme_minimal()
library(MASS)
#LDA with PCA, LOOCV
set.seed(20012021)
lda.fit1 <- lda(Cause~pca.train$x[,1]+pca.train$x[,2]+pca.train$x[,3]+pca.train$x[,4],data=lda.train,CV=TRUE)
table(lda.fit1$class,train$Cause)
mean(lda.fit1$class==train$Cause)
# Train Accuracy 0.4271654
#Original variables, LOOCV
set.seed(20012021)
control <- trainControl(method='LOOCV')
lda.fit2 <- train(Cause~., data=lda.train,
method = 'lda', metric = 'Accuracy', trControl = control)
# Training Accuracy 0.4409449
# Prediction with original variables
lda.pred <- predict(lda.fit2, newdata=lda.test)
lda.cm = confusionMatrix(lda.pred, lda.test$Cause)
# Performance
lda.cm #confmatrix
lda.con$overall[1] #acc
# Test Accuracy = 0.4765
conf_mat(table(lda.pred, lda.test$Cause), type = "heatmap") -> cm
autoplot(cm,type='heatmap') +
scale_fill_gradient2(low="firebrick1",mid = 'white', midpoint = 15, high = "chartreuse3") +
theme_minimal() +
theme(legend.position = "right", axis.text.x = element_text(angle=45, vjust=1.1,hjust=1)) +
ggtitle('Confusion Matrix LDA', subtitle = 'Test data')
detach('package::MASS', unload=T)
#############################RF####
## Random Forest
#################################
# Regarding Tree based models I'll jump directly to Random Forests and Boosting
# for better accuracy and lower variability.
library(randomForest)
# Simple model
set.seed(20012021)
rf.simple = randomForest(Cause~., data = train, mtry=as.integer(sqrt(10)), distribution='multinomial')
rf.simple #55.71% OOB-error (training error)
# By default the number of trees is 500, the chosen class for each observation is the most frequent of all the
# trees in which an observation has been evaluated, generally in 500/3 trees,
# and the number of terminal nodes in each tree is 1.
# The training error can be estimated without performing CV which would be more computationally expensive.
# This is thanks to the OOB samples we have for each tree.
# Tuning
getModelInfo()$rf$parameters
rfGrid = expand.grid(mtry=c(2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10))
rfacc <- 0
rftune = matrix(nrow = 5, ncol = 1)
dimnames(rftune) = list(c("k1", "k2", "k3", "k4", "k5"), c("mtry"))
# Simple CV
set.seed(20012021)
for (i in 1:5){
train.data = train[train.folds[[i]],]
validation.data = train[valid.fold[[i]],]
rf.fit <- train(Cause~., data=train.data, method = 'rf',
tuneGrid = rfGrid, metric='Accuracy', distribution='multinomial')
rf.fit
rf.pred <- predict(rf.fit,validation.data) #uses best model to predict
rfacc[i]=mean(rf.pred==validation.data$Cause)
rftune[i,1] = as.matrix(rf.fit$bestTune)
}
rftune
rfacc
mean(rfacc) #0.4805069
which.max(table(rftune)) -> position
mtry = rftune[position]
# Best model
set.seed(20012021)
rf.bst = randomForest(Cause~ . , data = train, mtry = 6,
metric = 'Accuracy', distribution = 'multinomial')
rf.bst #OOB error 56.3%
oob.error.data = data.frame(
Trees = rep(1:nrow(rf.bst$err.rate), times=9),
Class = rep(c('OBB', 'Arson', 'Children', 'Engines', 'Lightning',
'Miscellaneous', 'Smokers', 'Unknown', 'Vegetation Burning'),each = 500),
Error = c(rf.best$err.rate[,1], rf.best$err.rate[,2], rf.best$err.rate[,3],
rf.best$err.rate[,4], rf.best$err.rate[,5], rf.best$err.rate[,6],
rf.best$err.rate[,7], rf.best$err.rate[,8], rf.best$err.rate[,9]))
ggplot(data=oob.error.data, aes(x=Trees, y=Error))+
geom_line(aes(color=Class))+
theme_minimal() + ggtitle('OOB Error',subtitle = "Classification error of the best model, m=6")
#From the error data we see that the error rate is stable at 500 trees so it's not necessary to add more trees.
names(rf.bst)
rf.bst$confusion
heatmap(rf.bst$confusion[1:8,1:8], Rowv=NA, Colv=NA, scale='column')
#This plot represents where the predictions of each group mainly fall in.
rf.pred <- predict(rf.bst, newdata = test)
rf.con = confusionMatrix(rf.pred, test$Cause)
# Performance
rf.con$table #confmatrix
rf.con$overall[1] #acc
# Test Accuracy = 0.4411765
conf_mat(table(rf.pred, test$Cause), type = "heatmap") -> cm
autoplot(cm,type='heatmap') +
scale_fill_gradient2(low="firebrick1",mid = 'white', midpoint = 15, high = "chartreuse3") +
theme_minimal() +
theme(legend.position = "right", axis.text.x = element_text(angle=45, vjust=1.1,hjust=1))+
ggtitle('Confusion Matrix RF', subtitle = 'Test data')
#From the results we see that the best performance was using 9 features to compete in each split.
#Also note that the bagging (m=p=10) has similar accuracy. The OOB error rate is 50% so half of the OOB samples are
#correctly classified by the RF. And from the confusion matrix we see that 4 of the classes 0 true positives, with
# an error rate of 1 that's probably due to the similarity between this categories; Engines, Miscellaneous, Smokers and Unkown.
table(wildfires$Cause)
#Eventhough the Miscellaneous category has more observations than the lightning one, it has a higher test-error rate
#that's probability because in this category there is a mix of distinct unusual categories so it's extremly difficult
#to find a pattern for this category, same with the Unknown one. The lack of accuracy predicting the fires
#originated by an engine or a smoker can be associated with the model performance or small amount of observation
#available for this two categories.
#Importance of each variable, gini is a level of impurity
rf.importance = as.data.frame(rf.bst$importance)
rf.importance[order(importance),] #Square and municipality the most important
#####################################B####
## Boosting & XGBoost
#########################################
# The idea in boosting is to develop multiple weak prediction models sequentially,
# and that each of them uses the error of the previous ones in order to generate a stronger model,
# with better predictive power and better results stability.
library(gbm)
set.seed(20012021)
getModelInfo()$gbm$parameters
#check tunable parameters
gbmGrid <- expand.grid(interaction.depth = c(2,4,5,6,7,8,10), #Max Tree Depth
n.trees = c(100,500,800), #Boosting Iterations
shrinkage = c(.001, .005, .01, .05), #learning rate
n.minobsinnode = c(5, 10, 20)) #Minimum Terminal Node Size
## Stochastic Gradient Boosting ##
gbmacc <- 0
gbmtune = matrix(nrow = 5, ncol = 4) #nrow=k, ncol=tuning parameters
dimnames(gbmtune) = list(c("k1", "k2", "k3", "k4", "k5"), # row names
c("n.trees", "interaction.depth", "shrinkage", "n.minobsinnode")) # column names
# Nested CV
for (i in 1:5){
train.data = train[train.folds[[i]],]
validation.data = train[valid.fold[[i]],]
gbm.fit <- train(Cause~., data=train.data, method = 'gbm', trControl=fitControl,
tuneGrid=gbmGrid, metric='Accuracy', distribution='multinomial')
gbm.fit
gbm.pred <- predict(gbm.fit,validation.data) #uses best model to predict
gbmacc[i]=mean(gbm.pred==validation.data$Cause)
gbmtune[i,1:4] = as.matrix(gbm.fit$bestTune)
}
gbmtune
gbmacc
mean(gbmacc) # 0.4883699
# Best boosting model
set.seed(20012021)
gbm.BST = gbm(Cause~.,data = train,n.trees = 500, #I use a larger n.tree and then select best iter for the prediction
shrinkage = 0.005,interaction.depth = 7,
cv.folds = 5, n.minobsinnode = 10,
distribution = "multinomial")
# Check performance using 5-fold cross-validation
best.iter <- gbm.perf(gbm.BST,method="cv")
print(best.iter) # optimal number of trees
summary(gbm.BST,n.trees=best.iter)
# Predictions with test data
gbm.predBST <- predict(gbm.BST, n.trees=best.iter, newdata=test, type='response')
gbm.pred = as.matrix(gbm.predBST[,,1])
head(gbm.pred)
gbm.p.predBST = apply(gbm.predBST, 1, which.max)
gbm.p.predcat = colnames(gbm.predBST)[gbm.p.predBST] #giving category names
gbm.con = table(gbm.p.predcat,test$Cause)
gbm.test.acc = mean(gbm.p.predcat==test$Cause)
# Performance
gbm.con #confmatrix
gbm.test.acc #acc
# Test Accuracy = 0.4529412
conf_mat(table(gbm.p.predcat, test$Cause), type = "heatmap") -> cm
autoplot(cm,type='heatmap') +
scale_fill_gradient2(low="firebrick1",mid = 'white', midpoint = 15, high = "chartreuse3") +
theme_minimal() +
theme(legend.position = "right", axis.text.x = element_text(angle=45, vjust=1.1,hjust=1))+
ggtitle('Confusion Matrix Boosting', subtitle = 'Test data')
#############################xgb####
library(xgboost)
str(wildfires)
# All variables must be numeric and the target must start with 0 for first class
str(train)
# One-Hot Encoding
order(table(wildfires$Municipality), decreasing = T) -> o_m
cumsum(prop.table(table(wildfires$Municipality)[o_m]))
# There are 48 municipalities, yet a 50% of the fires occurr in 8 of them. Then, each of this
# municipalities will have it's oun dummy features and a 9th group will be for the remaining.
order(table(wildfires$Square), decreasing = T) -> o_s
cumsum(prop.table(table(wildfires$Square)[o_s]))
# Similarly with Square, 10 out of 52 values encompases a half of the observations.
dum.xgbdata = wildfires %>% mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.character))
freq_mun = levels(wildfires$Municipality)[o_m][1:8]
freq_sq = levels(wildfires$Square)[o_s][1:10]
for (i in 1:nrow(dum.xgbdata)) {
if (!(dum.xgbdata$Municipality[i] %in% freq_mun)){
dum.xgbdata$Municipality[i] = 'Other_mun'
}
if (!(dum.xgbdata$Square[i] %in% freq_sq)){
dum.xgbdata$Square[i] = 'Other_sq'
}
}
dummy = dummyVars(~Municipality+Square, data=xgbdata)
new = predict(dummy, newdata=xgbdata)
dum.xgbdata %<>% cbind(new) %>% select(-c(Municipality, Square))
# Transformation needed for the xgboost() function, yet not for train() with xgb. With dummies.
dum.train.xgb <- dum.xgbdata[train_index,] %>% select(-c(Cause)) %>%
as.matrix() %>% xgb.DMatrix(data=., label=(as.numeric(xgbdata[train_index,]$Cause)-1))
dum.test.xgb <- dum.xgbdata[-train_index,] %>% select(-c(Cause)) %>%
as.matrix() %>% xgb.DMatrix(data=., label=(as.numeric(xgbdata[-train_index,]$Cause)-1))
# Transformation needed for the xgboost() function, yet not for train() with xgb. With no dummies.
xgbdata <- wildfires %>% mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric))
train.xgb <- train %>% select(-Cause) %>%
mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric)) %>%
as.matrix() %>% xgb.DMatrix(data=., label=(as.numeric(train$Cause)-1))
test.xgb <- test %>% select(-Cause) %>%
mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric)) %>%
as.matrix() %>% xgb.DMatrix(data=., label=(as.numeric(test$Cause)-1))
set.seed(20012021)
xgbmGrid <- expand.grid(nrounds=c(100,200,500,700),
max_depth=c(2,4,6),
eta=c(0.001,0.005,0.01, 0.1),
gamma=c(0.01,0.001,0.0001),
colsample_bytree=0.75, #features suplyed to a tree
min_child_weight=0,
subsample=1) #all observations are given to each tree
# Dummy Nested CV
dum.xgbmacc <- 0
getModelInfo()$xgbTree$parameters
dum.xgbmtune = matrix(nrow = 5, ncol = 7) #nrow=k, ncol=tuning parameters
dimnames(dum.xgbmtune) = list(c("k1", "k2", "k3", "k4", "k5"), # row names
c("nrounds", "max_depth", "eta", "gamma","colsample_bytree"
,"min_child_weight", 'subsample')) # column names
for (i in 1:5){
train.data = dum.xgbdata[train_index,][train.folds[[i]],]
validation.data = xgbdata[train_index,][valid.fold[[i]],]
xgbm.fit <- train(Cause~., data=train.data, method = 'xgbTree', trControl=fitControl,
tuneGrid=xgbmGrid, metric='Accuracy', distribution='multinomial')
xgbm.fit
xgbm.pred <- predict(xgbm.fit,validation.data)
dum.xgbmacc[i]=mean(xgbm.pred==validation.data$Cause)
dum.xgbmtune[i,1:7] = as.matrix(xgbm.fit$bestTune)
}
dum.xgbmtune
dum.xgbmacc
mean(dum.xgbmacc) #0.4645881
# Normal Nested CV
xgbmacc <- 0
xgbmtune = matrix(nrow = 5, ncol = 7)
dimnames(xgbmtune) = list(c("k1", "k2", "k3", "k4", "k5"),
c("nrounds", "max_depth", "eta", "gamma","colsample_bytree"
,"min_child_weight", 'subsample'))
for (i in 1:5){
train.data = xgbdata[train_index,][train.folds[[i]],]
validation.data = xgbdata[train_index,][valid.fold[[i]],]
xgbm.fit <- train(Cause~., data=train.data, method = 'xgbTree', trControl=fitControl,
tuneGrid=xgbmGrid, metric='Accuracy', distribution='multinomial')
xgbm.fit
xgbm.pred <- predict(xgbm.fit,validation.data)
xgbmacc[i]=mean(xgbm.pred==validation.data$Cause)
xgbmtune[i,1:7] = as.matrix(xgbm.fit$bestTune)
}
xgbmtune
xgbmacc
mean(xgbmacc) #0.4725473
# Best Model
num_classes = length(unique(wildfires$Cause))
nrounds = 700
set.seed(20012021)
xgb.bst <- xgboost(data = train.xgb, max.depth = 2, eta = 0.010, gamma = 0.0001,
nthread = 2, nrounds = nrounds, num_class = num_classes,
min_child_weight = 0, subsample=1,
colsample_bytree=0.75,
objective = "multi:softmax",
prediction = T, verbose = 2)
# Predict
bestxgb.pred <- predict(xgb.bst, newdata = dum.test.xgb)
bestxgb.predcat = levels(wildfires$Cause)[bestxgb.pred + 1] #giving category names
xgb.con = table(bestxgb.predcat,test$Cause)
xgb.test.acc = mean(bestxgb.predcat==test$Cause)
bestxgb.predcat %<>% factor(levels=levels(wildfires$Cause))
# Performance
xgb.con #confmatrix
xgb.test.acc #acc
# Test Accuracy = 0.5294118
rf.bst$confusion
#Confusion matrix similar to the one with the random forest.
conf_mat(table(bestxgb.predcat, test$Cause), type = "heatmap") -> cm
autoplot(cm,type='heatmap') +
scale_fill_gradient2(low="firebrick1",mid = 'white', midpoint = 15, high = "chartreuse3") +
theme_minimal() +
theme(legend.position = "right", axis.text.x = element_text(angle=45, vjust=1.1,hjust=1)) +
ggtitle('Confusion Matrix XGB', subtitle = 'Test data')
####################################KNN#####
## K-Nearest Neighbors
#########################################
library(class)
#knn with a LOOCV
knn.data <- wildfires %>% select(-Cause) %>%
mutate(across(c(Square, Municipality), as.numeric))
knn.train = knn.data[train_index,1:10]
y.train = as.numeric(wildfires$Cause)[train_index]
knn.test = knn.data[-train_index,1:10]
y.test = as.numeric(wildfires$Cause)[-train_index]
set.seed(20012021)
knn.acc = data.frame('k'=NA, 'Accuracy'=NA)
for (n in c(1:20)){
knn.pred = knn.cv(knn.train, cl=y.train, k=n)
a = mean(knn.pred==as.numeric(wildfires$Cause))
knn.acc[n,1]=n
knn.acc[n,2]=a
}
knn.acc %<>% na.omit()
ggplot(knn.acc, aes(x=k, y=Accuracy))+
geom_line(color='red')+
geom_point()+
theme_minimal() + ggtitle('KNN',subtitle = "Accuracy using different k")
knn.acc[which.max(knn.acc$Accuracy),]
# Visually I select k = 9
knn.acc[which(knn.acc$k==9),] #0.3289086
knn.pred = knn.cv(knn.test, cl=y.test, k=9)
table(levels(test$Cause)[knn.pred],test$Cause)
mean(as.numeric(test$Cause)==knn.pred) #0.3823529
conf_mat(table(levels(test$Cause)[knn.pred], test$Cause), type = "heatmap") -> cm
autoplot(cm,type='heatmap') +
scale_fill_gradient2(low="firebrick1",mid = 'white', midpoint = 15, high = "chartreuse3") +
theme_minimal() +
theme(legend.position = "right", axis.text.x = element_text(angle=45, vjust=1.1,hjust=1))+
ggtitle('Confusion Matrix KNN', subtitle = 'Test data')
####################################BstAlg#####
## Best Algorithm, Gradient Boosting
#########################################
set.seed(20012021)
finalGrid <- expand.grid(interaction.depth = c(4,5,6,8),
n.trees = c(100,500,800),
shrinkage = c(.001, .005, .01),
n.minobsinnode = c(5, 10, 20))
finalmodel <- train(Cause~., data=train, method = 'gbm', trControl=fitControl,
tuneGrid=gbmGrid, metric='Accuracy', distribution='multinomial')
finalmodel$bestTune
finalpred <- predict(finalmodel, test)
mean(finalpred==test$Cause) #0.5529412
########################CM####
# Confusion matrix, GBM on test data performed previously
confusionMatrix(as.factor(finalpred), test$Cause)$table %>%
prop.table(margin = 1) %>%
as.data.frame.matrix() %>%
rownames_to_column(var = 'actual') %>%
gather(key = 'prediction', value = 'freq',-actual) -> cm
cm$freq %<>% replace(cm$actual %in% c('Smokers', 'Unknown'), 0)
ggplot(cm, aes(x = actual, y = prediction, fill = freq)) +
geom_tile() +
geom_text(aes(label = round(freq, 2)), size = 3, color = 'gray20') +
scale_fill_gradient(low = 'yellow', high = 'red', limits = c(0,1), name = 'Relative Frequency') +
theme_minimal() + xlab('Prediction') + ylab('Truth')+
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1, vjust = 1.1, size = 8)) +
ggtitle('Confusion Matrix', subtitle = 'Boosting')
######################VI####
# Variable importance Boosting
final.imp = summary(finalmodel) #This variable importance comes from the training of the best GBoosting model done previously.
final.imp[which(final.imp$rel.inf!=0),]
final.imp$var %<>% replace(startsWith(final.imp$var, 'Mun'), 'Municipality') %>%
replace(startsWith(final.imp$var, 'Sq'), 'Square')
aggregate(final.imp$rel.inf,by=list(final.imp$var), FUN=sum) %>%
ggplot(aes(x=Group.1,y=x)) +
geom_bar(stat='identity',aes(fill=Group.1))+
theme_minimal()+
theme(axis.title.x=element_blank(), axis.text.x=element_blank(),axis.ticks.x=element_blank())+
ylab('Relative Influence(%)') +
ggtitle('Boosting Feature Importance', subtitle = 'Proportion of Gain in splits by feature')
summary(finalmodel)
# Comparing the variable importance of Boosting with the XGB
importance <- xgb.importance(feature_names = NULL, model = xgb.bst)
importance
# Gain represents fractional contribution of each feature to the
# model based on the total gain of this feature's splits. Higher percentage means a more important predictive feature.
# Cover metric of the number of observation related to this feature
# Frequency percentage representing the relative number of times a feature have been used in trees
ggplot(importance, aes(x=Feature,y=Gain)) +
geom_bar(stat='identity',aes(fill=Feature))+
theme_minimal()+
theme(axis.title.x=element_blank(), axis.text.x=element_blank(),axis.ticks.x=element_blank())+
ggtitle('XGB Feature Importance', subtitle = 'Proportion of Gain in splits by feature')
ggplot(importance, aes(x=Feature,y=Frequency)) +
geom_bar(stat='identity',aes(fill=Feature))+
theme_minimal()+
theme(axis.title.x=element_blank(), axis.text.x=element_blank(),axis.ticks.x=element_blank())+
ggtitle('XGB Feature Importance', subtitle = 'Relative number of times(%) a feature has been used in a tree')
#############################Unknwon####
# Predict Unknown category with best algorithm
train_set = wildfires %>% filter(Cause!='Unknown') %>%
droplevels('Unknown')
test_set = wildfires %>% filter(Cause=='Unknown')
test_set$Cause %<>% factor(level='Unknown')
set.seed(20012021)
Unknown.model <- train(Cause~., data=train_set, method = 'gbm', trControl=fitControl,
tuneGrid=gbmGrid, metric='Accuracy', distribution='multinomial')
# Predict
test_set %<>% filter(Municipality!='CONSELL')
Unknown.pred <- predict(Unknown.model, test_set)
Unknown.pred
as.data.frame(table(Unknown.pred))[c(1,4,5,7),] -> data
colnames(data)=c('Category', 'Frequency')
ggplot(data, aes(x=Category,y=Frequency)) +
geom_bar(stat='identity',aes(fill=Category))+
theme_minimal()+
theme(axis.title.x=element_blank(), axis.text.x=element_blank(),axis.ticks.x=element_blank())+
geom_text(aes(label = Frequency), size = 3, color = 'gray20')+
ggtitle('Prediction of the Unknown', subtitle = 'Stochasting Gradient Boosting')