-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Roadmap for Graphs.jl 2.0 #128
Comments
Here are a few topics that seem important to discuss, in no particular order. Feel free to add your own! Support vertex and edge metadata Add easier access to edges
Relax restrictions on vertex indices & iterators Clarify support (or lack thereof) for multigraphs Settle the question of flows and matchings Improve usability of shortest paths Improve code style Fix heisenbugs in Parallel tests |
It would be nice for us to use a generic interface to metadata that's not exclusive to graphs. |
I would add higher order networks to this list. Simplicial Sets (Vertices, Edges, Triangles, Tetrahedra ...), Hypergraphs (V, S\subset Powerset(V)), Directed Hypergraphs, Bipartite graphs, etc would be good to think about. |
Clarify the API of all hidden assumptions, make the API complete
Consider returning only vertices for algorithms that return an induced subgraph
consistent approach for graph direction
New Features (Not specifically 2.0, but could be nice goals)Provide basic and generic features for graph traversalBasic support for planarity, bipartite graphs, DAG, trees...Support for graph views (for filtering operations on edges or vertices, or light contraction operations) |
@Tokazama Have you a more precise idea of your suggestion ? I'm not sure to understand what it would looks like. |
In terms of trait support I'd like to suggest two things:
|
This is a very rough draft of a generic interface for metadata I've been working on. My OSS time has been severely limited the past month due to a short term shift in my work schedule, so not much progress has been made. I think I need to write up a more exhaustive proposal describing the issue that needs to be solved with some input from other interested developers (it's a bit high level for most users). I've thought about putting something on discourse but I fear getting input from everybody that happens upon it will be a bit distracting. |
There's discussion related to metadata here JuliaData/DataAPI.jl#22 |
Regarding the multigraphs, I have the impression it would be fairly easy to have support in the Graphs.jl |
I'll take a look! |
Recently, a lot of interesting but compatibility-breaking suggestions have emerged when dealing with specific issues. In order for these ideas not to be forgotten, here is a thread where we can start to organize major changes with a possible 2.0 release in mind.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: