You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From the release announcement:
"Another problem is that you should support complex angles. For example, if you have a total-internal-reflected ray, the transmitted angle is complex, but it is still perfectly valid, and the complex reflection coefficient is still useful in telling you the reflected phase. You’ll also a complex transmitted “angle” if the transmission medium is lossy (complex index)."
I have never touched complex angles, but help on this is very welcome!
One thing that I would require of the implementation is that it still allows checking of the angle magnitudes (?), as angles above 90 degrees give silent errors (garbage results).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From the release announcement:
"Another problem is that you should support complex angles. For example, if you have a total-internal-reflected ray, the transmitted angle is complex, but it is still perfectly valid, and the complex reflection coefficient is still useful in telling you the reflected phase. You’ll also a complex transmitted “angle” if the transmission medium is lossy (complex index)."
I have never touched complex angles, but help on this is very welcome!
One thing that I would require of the implementation is that it still allows checking of the angle magnitudes (?), as angles above 90 degrees give silent errors (garbage results).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: