You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
this is mainly a reminder that we (e.g. @achimmiri) are facing duplicated peaks in a record.
The PK$ANNOTATION might have multiple formulae, and then the PK$PEAK
are also duplicated. I think the PK$PEAK should be unique. This is with a fairly
old snapshot of RMB, so we'll report back if that is still the case in the recently merged
s4power branch.
Yours,
Steffen
@sneumann@achimmiri those ppm values are huge ... can you try with a lower ppm setting (5 or 10?). Otherwise if this is TOF data with such large error margins maybe recal is not the best idea (you could set recalibrate.identity). RMassBank can deal with multiple formulas (see e.g. any fluorinated EA or EQ spectrum!) but indeed we did encounter this strange duplication in the past as a quite rare occurrence that we could not explain. To debug/investigate @meowcat would need the msWorkflow file (from the new branch). Thanks!
Precisely - this is a worrying bug and it would be great if I could debug this with the original data; I have zero chance of reproducing this on my own.
Hi,
this is mainly a reminder that we (e.g. @achimmiri) are facing duplicated peaks in a record.
The
PK$ANNOTATION
might have multiple formulae, and then thePK$PEAK
are also duplicated. I think the
PK$PEAK
should be unique. This is with a fairlyold snapshot of RMB, so we'll report back if that is still the case in the recently merged
s4power branch.
Yours,
Steffen
Yours,
Steffen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: