Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

January 2018 Hackathon review and feedback on further iterations of the Knowledge Beacon API #34

Open
RichardBruskiewich opened this issue Dec 21, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@RichardBruskiewich
Copy link
Collaborator

Time to review the good, the bad and the ugly of the overall objectives, big picture design and implementation priorities of the Knowledge Beacon API. After 9 months of working with the concept and the specific initial implementation, what would we do differently now? What is missing (e.g. Provenance)? What is less useful or awkward to use? Is there a better way to specify it? Is the data representation optimal (e.g. REST/JSON) or would a RDF/LOD standard work better? What specific standards should be enforced (e.g. data type semantics? relation predicate semantics?) Are there any practical operational issues (e.g. standards for dealing with problematic queries? Exception/error reporting)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant