Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reflect layout changes to the object store #12

Closed
metazool opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Reflect layout changes to the object store #12

metazool opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@metazool
Copy link
Collaborator

Recent updates to the annotation half of this project include changes to the layout of the object store; so the scripts that create an intake index and read from it no longer work as intended.

Needs a small set of changes to reflect the different locations (separate buckets per-site, per-instrument) and write a shared index in the intake part.

Also needs lightweight documentation of the intake approach and its (potential, mixed) benefits - see also #4 for a discussion of how to slowly introduce a more standards-oriented approach (discoverability, reusability, all the FAIR things)

@metazool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

metazool commented Aug 5, 2024

See also the connected issue in the internal cyto-ML project around embedding more metadata in the EXIF headers of the single images during the preprocessing (lon/lat, date, depth, other?)

@metazool
Copy link
Collaborator Author

metazool commented Aug 8, 2024

See #18

@metazool metazool closed this as completed Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant