Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor design flaw in CAD #2

Open
zebrassimo opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Minor design flaw in CAD #2

zebrassimo opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@zebrassimo
Copy link

Hi gents, while trying to get myself confident with the design (maybe I want to rebuild doggo :-), I found this:

SDP_a_6a53m048nf098
blue: SDP intersects with Outer Leg Shaft
red: SDPs intersect with each other

I trust you have fixed this after printing.

@CrazyAZ
Copy link
Collaborator

CrazyAZ commented Apr 24, 2019

It's great to see interest in rebuilding Doggo.

It appears that your CAD is using two inner shaft pulleys, when instead there are separate pulleys for the inner and outer shaft. The CAD should look like this:
Screen Shot 2019-04-24 at 11 38 43 AM
And the pulley that goes on the outer shaft looks like this:
Screen Shot 2019-04-24 at 11 43 54 AM
As far as I can tell this is what is in our distributed full CAD, but if you still think there's an issue I can look into it.

Hope this was helpful. Let us know if you have any more questions.

@zebrassimo
Copy link
Author

zebrassimo commented Apr 24, 2019 via email

@zebrassimo
Copy link
Author

So I figured that the link https://a360.co/2OBxTbH leads me to the browser view and here it's fine:
image
When I download the Fusion360 archive (email required) I receive a file called Full Doggo CAD.f3z which which is binary the same as the one I uploaded into my Fusion360 which caused the issue initially mentioned.

Well, never mind I'll get alog with this.

@maxsu
Copy link

maxsu commented Aug 10, 2019

I've checked all four sets of inner and outer pulleys in the v1.0 doggo hardware model (https://a360.co/2OBxTbH), and they look correct:
image
image

This looks like it is internal revision 3:

image
Therefore I can only guess that the issue was caused by one of:

A) There is some earlier, publicly available revison that shows @zebrassimo's issue
B) There was some import glitch or other error on @zebrassimo's side

I believe that Fusion 360 Public Links point to the latest revision of a design, which would technically allow A) to happen. However @zebrassimo's 'same binary' comment makes me give more weight to B).

It would be useful to gain insight on the CAD environment that caused the issue. However, if there is no replication then this issue seems closed.

@zebrassimo, what CAD software did you import into? Have you been able to replicate the issue since?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants