Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🧱 We should use Conventional Commits 🧱 #286

Open
jbampton opened this issue Dec 28, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

🧱 We should use Conventional Commits 🧱 #286

jbampton opened this issue Dec 28, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request hacktoberfest

Comments

@jbampton
Copy link
Member

https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

"The Conventional Commits specification is a lightweight convention on top of commit messages. It provides an easy set of rules for creating an explicit commit history; which makes it easier to write automated tools on top of. This convention dovetails with SemVer, by describing the features, fixes, and breaking changes made in commit messages."

There are GitHub Actions you can use on PRs to enforce Conventional Commits
@jbampton jbampton added the Enhancement New feature or request label Dec 28, 2021
@jbampton jbampton self-assigned this Dec 28, 2021
@jbampton jbampton changed the title We should use Conventional Commits 🧱 We should use Conventional Commits 🧱 Jan 12, 2022
@jbampton jbampton removed their assignment Oct 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request hacktoberfest
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jbampton