Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Marking definitions" issues between different “Groups” within the same “Roles” #8759

Open
misohouse opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
bug use for describing something not working as expected needs more info Intel needed about the use case

Comments

@misohouse
Copy link

OpenCTI version : 6.3.6

I want to show data separately between different groups that exist within the same role.

To accomplish what I wanted, I set up roles, groups, accounts, and marking definitions as shown in the photo below.

role
role2
group
account
44
55

The problem is that when I log in as the test account and check, I see data with a marking definitions(Test_B) that I didn't specify in the settings.
66

The group assigned to the test account is Test_A, and only Test_A has been assigned a marking definition, so I think it is normal that data with a Test_B marking definition should not be visible.

Or is it because I set the order value to 0 when I set the marking definition?

I ask because I see data from other marking groups even when I don't specify roles when setting up groups.

I would appreciate your response to this issue.

@misohouse misohouse added bug use for describing something not working as expected needs triage use to identify issue needing triage from Filigran Product team labels Oct 24, 2024
@nino-filigran
Copy link

It does not sound right @misohouse , I'll try to reproduce, but in the meantime, could you let me know 3 things?

  • did you create your marking after you created you group "external"?
  • could you verify what marking "external" has access to?
  • could you verify, when you go to external, edit this group, whether this group has the toggle "
    Automatically authorize this group to new marking definition" enabled ?

@nino-filigran nino-filigran added needs more info Intel needed about the use case and removed needs triage use to identify issue needing triage from Filigran Product team labels Oct 24, 2024
@misohouse
Copy link
Author

@nino-filigran

Q1. did you create your marking after you created you group "external"?
A1.
That's right. The External role is the role you created previously.

Then I created the Test_A group and added only the Test_A group to the External role.

Finally, I created the Test_A marking definition, and added the Test_A marking definition to the Test_A group
.
.
.
.
.
.
Q2. could you verify what marking "external" has access to?
A2.
The Marking definitions accessible to the External group are shown in the figure below.
111
.
.
.
.
.
.
Q3. could you verify, when you go to external, edit this group, whether this group has the toggle "Automatically authorize this group to new marking definition" enabled ?
A3.
I think the screen below might answer your question.
112

@nino-filigran
Copy link

Ok thanks for your quick answer. At least I can already evacuate this option. I'll keep you posted about reproduction and any questions/information I might need.

@nino-filigran
Copy link

I can't manage to reproduce so far, will keep investigating. Could you perform the same check than above but for the 2 groups TEST_A & TEST_B ( just to be sure)?

@nino-filigran
Copy link

Could you share also also a screenshot of your marking definition page?

@nino-filigran
Copy link

And last question from my side: what is the process you have followed when creating your marking & users?
Did you create all your users & groups first? And/Or your markings? & Did you assign all markings to your groups in one go, or did you create one marking, assigned it to a group, then created another marking & assigned it to a group?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug use for describing something not working as expected needs more info Intel needed about the use case
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants