Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

using the KITTI dataset are not as good as those in the paper. #10

Open
lijing137 opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

using the KITTI dataset are not as good as those in the paper. #10

lijing137 opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@lijing137
Copy link

lijing137 commented May 28, 2024

Hi,Thank you very much for making this excellent work available. However, I encountered some issues while using it. The results obtained using the KITTI dataset are not as good as those presented in the paper. I hope you can provide some guidance.

Result(former is mine, latter is paper)
mine
paper

platform
ubuntu20.04;Ros1

dataset
i use the kitti2bag tool generate a *.bag file (kitti_2011_09_26_drive_0039_synced.bag)
https://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/raw_data.php?type=residential

parameter
parameter use the default /config/KITTI.yaml

voxel_size: 0.05
sdf_trunc: 0.1
space_carving: False

fill_holes: True
min_weight: 3.0

apply_pose: True
preprocess: True
min_range: 1.0
max_range: 75.0
pcl_topic: "/kitti/velo/pointcloud"

use_tf_transforms: true
parent_frame: "world"
child_frame: "base_link"
timestamp_tolerance_ns: 10000000

I hope you can provide some guidance. Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant