You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A variety of semantic resources have been or are being developed in the Earth sciences. In many cases, these are compiled by hand from other usually textual resources. For example, the ESIP community maintained SWEET ontology is partly based off the science keyword lists maintained by the Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). In other cases, these resources are generated using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning techniques tailored to the Earth Sciences.
This leads to a few questions:
Are vocabularies, keyword lists, etc. considered software to be cited in the context of this group? If not, where should these sorts of entities be considered?
What about actual formal ontologies? This is probably a connection point to the ESIP Semantic cluster
What about the software used to semi-automatically generate any of the whole range of semantic resources in the Earth sciences?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A variety of semantic resources have been or are being developed in the Earth sciences. In many cases, these are compiled by hand from other usually textual resources. For example, the ESIP community maintained SWEET ontology is partly based off the science keyword lists maintained by the Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). In other cases, these resources are generated using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning techniques tailored to the Earth Sciences.
This leads to a few questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: