-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate module_name
and automatically perform extraction for all available modules?
#89
Comments
model_name
and automatically perform extraction for all available modules?
model_name
and automatically perform extraction for all available modules?module_name
and automatically perform extraction for all available modules?
Suggestion: Let user provide either |
This sounds reasonable. We should probably only accept |
For this, we want to use |
I second letting users provide names. Otherwise, some users might be suprised/confused how much of their storage - depending on the network they chose - is now filled with activations for dozens of modules :) I'm not sure if I'd go with |
I think making extracting all modules more explicit makes sense, otherwise you could just do it by accident. Maybe the best option would be to only allow |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: