Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
It's not hard. But we're not going to change the example in this repo. You can do it yourself by changing
this will initialize the dynamodb client in every invocation, which can potentially add a few hundred milliseconds of latency to every invocation. We don't recommend it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you for this! However, you said "discourage" but are you aware it's currently not possible to instantiate any sort of Sometime recently it stopped working, since |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don't think there have been any change in this repo for that to stop working recently. I have not looked in the SDK to see if there are changes regarding Send bounds. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For consistency in my codebase, I'm wondering how easy would it be to rewrite this http example using the
lambda_runtimein place of thelambda_http?:https://github.com/awslabs/aws-lambda-rust-runtime/blob/main/examples/http-dynamodb/src/main.rs#L56
One reason for doing this is I've noticed
lambda_runtimedoesn't complain aboutSendmissing when instantiating a (dynamodb)Clientinside thefunction_handler, which I prefer doing.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions