You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you all for all the work on boost/beast, it is a great library to use. I am working on a project which needs an embedded HTTP server, and I switched from civetweb to beast. One thing I am wondering is the actual achievable latency of beast. My project will be doing a large amount of HTTP requests so throughput and latency matter to me.
I run the http awaitable server with 1.86 against wrk. The benchmarking result is ranging from 250us to 400us. Is this the lowest latency I can achieve with boost beast, or am i missing anything here?
Hey,
Thank you all for all the work on boost/beast, it is a great library to use. I am working on a project which needs an embedded HTTP server, and I switched from civetweb to beast. One thing I am wondering is the actual achievable latency of beast. My project will be doing a large amount of HTTP requests so throughput and latency matter to me.
I run the http awaitable server with 1.86 against wrk. The benchmarking result is ranging from 250us to 400us. Is this the lowest latency I can achieve with boost beast, or am i missing anything here?
Regards,
An example is as follows.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: