Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove side-by-side installs #989

Closed
gep13 opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #991
Closed

Remove side-by-side installs #989

gep13 opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #991
Assignees
Labels
5 - Released The issue has been resolved, and released to the public for consumption BreakingChange The issue will introduce backwards incompatible changes
Milestone

Comments

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Mar 20, 2023

Is Your Feature Request Related To A Problem? Please describe.

Side-by-side installs were deprecated so we should now remove the functionality from the collection for version 2.0 or later of Chocolatey CLI

We should look to Puppet, Ansible and DSC providers for this to ensure they are aware of the deprecation.

Describe The Solution. Why is it needed?

N/A

Additional Context.

N/A

Related Issues

@gep13 gep13 added BreakingChange The issue will introduce backwards incompatible changes 2 - Working A user or team member has started working on the issue labels Mar 20, 2023
@gep13 gep13 added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Mar 20, 2023
@gep13 gep13 self-assigned this Mar 20, 2023
gep13 added a commit to gep13/ChocolateyGUI that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2023
With the upstream change in Chocolatey CLI to remove the usage of side
by side installations, we need to do the same thing within Chocolatey
GUI to prevent errors from happening.

This commit removes the usage of the properties that have been removed
from Chocolatey CLI, as well as changes the GUI to not include the
setting of these properties.
@gep13 gep13 linked a pull request Mar 20, 2023 that will close this issue
10 tasks
@gep13 gep13 added 3 - Review Code has been added, and is available for review as a pull request and removed 2 - Working A user or team member has started working on the issue labels Mar 20, 2023
vexx32 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2023
@gep13 gep13 added 4 - Done Code has been added to the repository, and has been reviewed by a team member and removed 3 - Review Code has been added, and is available for review as a pull request labels Mar 30, 2023
corbob added a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2023
* release/2.0.0: (61 commits)
  (maint) Update to latest Chocolatey NuGet package
  (maint) Update to latest Chocolatey package
  (build) Re-enable release notes export
  (maint) Added copyright to nuspec file
  (build) Updated GRM config file
  (maint) Update to released beta packages
  (maint) Switch from int to long
  (maint) Update to latest beta Chocolatey packages
  (maint) Remove @everyone from Discord notification
  (maint) Bump to beta package in nuspec
  (maint) Update to latest beta Chocolatey packages
  (build) Update to latest Chocolatey.Cake.Recipe
  (build) Remove unnecessary configuration
  (build) Add notification templates
  (maint) Prevent download of relase notes
  (#974) Update to released beta packages
  (#974) Update to beta packages for Chocolatey
  (#989) Remove usage of side by side
  (#990) Fix usage of ListCommand
  (#974) Update to latest alpha package
  ...
@gep13 gep13 added 5 - Released The issue has been resolved, and released to the public for consumption and removed 4 - Done Code has been added to the repository, and has been reviewed by a team member labels May 31, 2023
@choco-bot
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 2.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your GitReleaseManager bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Released The issue has been resolved, and released to the public for consumption BreakingChange The issue will introduce backwards incompatible changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants