You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Got the feedback below from John via mail. We should take it into account for future versions.
These probabilities must be acceptably low
I don’t think this is true. The advantage per key is a quite useless measure for security protocols/use cases with several keys and maybe ever several connections. Keeping these probabilities low does not increase security when advantage functions are linear.
I would not talk so much of the CA IA probabilities per key on slide 4-5. These are not very relevant measures for OSCORE, especially not OSCORE with rekeying. A relevant measure instead of IA per key would be forgery probability per forgery attempt (or perharps per number of byte sent.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Got the feedback below from John via mail. We should take it into account for future versions.
I don’t think this is true. The advantage per key is a quite useless measure for security protocols/use cases with several keys and maybe ever several connections. Keeping these probabilities low does not increase security when advantage functions are linear.
I would not talk so much of the CA IA probabilities per key on slide 4-5. These are not very relevant measures for OSCORE, especially not OSCORE with rekeying. A relevant measure instead of IA per key would be forgery probability per forgery attempt (or perharps per number of byte sent.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: