[cmplx.over] Should we reorder the paragraphs?

[frederick-vs-ja]

It seems that [cmplx.over]/2 should be applied to all functions mentioned in [cmplx.over], so that the result type of std::pow(std::complex<float>(1.0f), 1l) isn't accidently changed by P1467R9. I attempted to submit an LWG issue for reverting the possible type change, and there shouldn't be one if I just misread the wording.

However, if [cmplx.over]/2 is applied to all mentioned functions, the paragraph is perhaps misplaced, and IMO it should be move to the top or the bottom of [cmplx.over] (possibly with some rewording).