Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I conducted the experiment according to the paper, but there is a gap between the experimental results and the paper. I hope to get your help. #38

Open
renqi1120 opened this issue Jun 24, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@renqi1120
Copy link

Hello author:
I conducted a reconstruction experiment, but there was a gap between the results of the paper.
I set parameters as :
method recon;loss_compact 0.01;loss_separate 0.01;t_length 1;alpha 0.7;
th 0.015 .
Experimental AUC results : ped2 87. 355%; avenue 72.122%; shanghai 68.086% .
How can I achieve the expected experimental results. Thank you for your attention.

@LiAoChUnLiNs
Copy link

I suspect that the label on the avenue may be incorrect. Many normal labels give abnormal

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants