QUESTION: More robust tests?

[pedrosanta]

Hello,

So, another topic for discussion.

For some time now, I have felt the need to have more robust tests, a more robust test coverage and test workflow for this lib, because I think this will also help this lib to become more robust, reliable.

I don't have a strong opinion on the test stack – so I'm open to comments –, perhaps we could start setting up some groundwork using Mocha, and take it from there, or so.

Thoughts? @cyrilis?

PS: Perhaps we could bundle this improvement with #49 and #56, and, with a more robust lib, start discussing future 0.1/0.x/1.0(?) release roadmaps? Does that makes sense?

[gonejack]

I would suggest typescript for more accurate validations on data or better documenting.