You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently when you --save-resources on a lula validate run, the resources are added to a resources directory. There's no delineation across validate runs, everything just gets dumped to a top-level directory.
A possible improvement to this architecture might be to create sub-directories for each validate execution (probably named via timestamp) and place the resources there instead.
Additional context
This might be tied to conversations about "opinionated directory structuring" that we've had, but can't find an associated issue.
Expected Deliverable
Additional directory layer tied to a validation run
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently when you --save-resources on a
lula validate
run, the resources are added to aresources
directory. There's no delineation across validate runs, everything just gets dumped to a top-level directory.A possible improvement to this architecture might be to create sub-directories for each
validate
execution (probably named via timestamp) and place the resources there instead.Additional context
This might be tied to conversations about "opinionated directory structuring" that we've had, but can't find an associated issue.
Expected Deliverable
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: