Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Wilma usage in case of Unit test #65

Closed
tkohegyi opened this issue Nov 3, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve Wilma usage in case of Unit test #65

tkohegyi opened this issue Nov 3, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tkohegyi
Copy link
Contributor

tkohegyi commented Nov 3, 2015

By using the API lib, it should be capable to use for unit tests more easily than ever.

@tkohegyi tkohegyi self-assigned this Jan 27, 2016
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2016
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2016
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2016
…able API functions - and an API bug identified around uploading stub config and template files was fixed.
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2016
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2016
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2016
+ /config/public/service?getUniqueId service method is added to Wilma
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2016
…ged to master, major work of #65 implementation is done
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2016
tkohegyi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016
no change in functionality, just in test code
@tkohegyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually done, some how to in functional tests, need to provide documentation however
.NET API is not yet ready, #75 created.
Further improvement possibility was identified: #74

@tkohegyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Documentation is available: Stub Configuration - via Service API

Considered as done, further work is necessary only when feedback arrives.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant