Skip to content

Explorer integration: Blockscout and Atlas support for 0x76 transactions #130

Description

@tac0turtle

Summary

Integrate block explorer support for ev-reth chains, targeting both Blockscout (open-source, self-hosted) and Atlas (in-house explorer). Both need custom rendering for Evolve-specific transaction types (0x76 batch calls, fee sponsorship).

Motivation

Every production chain needs a block explorer. ev-reth's custom transaction type (0x76) with batch calls and fee sponsorship won't render correctly in stock explorers -- it will show as an unknown transaction type with opaque calldata. Both Blockscout (for self-hosted/community deployments) and Atlas (for first-party deployments) need to understand Evolve primitives.

Scope

1. RPC layer (shared by both explorers)

The RPC responses from ev-reth must expose 0x76 fields in a way explorers can consume:

  • eth_getTransactionByHash must include feePayer (address), calls (array of {to, value, input}), and txType: "0x76"
  • eth_getTransactionReceipt must indicate effective gas payer and per-call log attribution
  • This is the foundation -- get the RPC right and both explorers benefit

2. Blockscout integration

  • Document archive node configuration for ev-reth
  • Docker compose setup for Blockscout + ev-reth
  • Verify standard Ethereum transactions (types 0, 1, 2, 3) render correctly
  • Verify RPC compatibility (Blockscout's required endpoints vs ev-reth's exposed endpoints)
  • Custom 0x76 rendering via Blockscout's plugin/extension system:
    • Batch calls: Display individual calls within a 0x76 transaction instead of opaque calldata
    • Fee sponsorship: Show feePayer address, distinguish executor vs sponsor
    • Transaction type label: "EvNode Transaction" instead of "Unknown Type"

3. Atlas integration

  • Ensure Atlas consumes the extended RPC fields for 0x76 transactions
  • Native rendering of batch calls, sponsorship, and Evolve-specific metadata
  • Atlas can go deeper than Blockscout since it's in-house: lane attribution, per-call gas breakdown, sponsor history, etc.

4. ev-node considerations

  • Explorers need to handle ev-reth's block structure (no ommers, modified consensus fields)
  • Block finality semantics: ev-node-derived finality vs explorer default assumptions
  • If the chain uses ev-node for DA, explorers should ideally link to DA layer block references

Prior art

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

  • Status
    Backlog

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions