Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSAL] Deprecate in favor of new Fluent Node Logger #177

Open
agup006 opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[PROPOSAL] Deprecate in favor of new Fluent Node Logger #177

agup006 opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@agup006
Copy link
Member

agup006 commented Aug 5, 2021

Hi all,

@jamiees2 has created a new library (https://github.com/fluent/fluentd-node) that has many more capabilities including bulk uploading. I would like to propose adding a notice to this repository to guide users to that new library that is actively maintained and used in production.

@okkez I know you have been a maintainer of the library and wanted to check if you have any thoughts on the migration.

@okkez
Copy link
Contributor

okkez commented Aug 12, 2021

Sounds nice.

jamiees2 added a commit to jamiees2/fluentd-docs-gitbook that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2021
Given fluent/fluent-logger-node#177, `(`fluent-logger-node`)[https://github.com/fluent/fluent-logger-node] has been replaced with (`fluent-logger-forward-node`)[https://github.com/fluent/fluent-logger-forward-node]. This updates the documentation to reflect that.
jamiees2 added a commit to jamiees2/fluentd-docs-gitbook that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2021
Given fluent/fluent-logger-node#177, `(`fluent-logger-node`)[https://github.com/fluent/fluent-logger-node] has been replaced with (`fluent-logger-forward-node`)[https://github.com/fluent/fluent-logger-forward-node]. This updates the documentation to reflect that.

Signed-off-by: James Elias Sigurdarson <jamiees2@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants