Replies: 1 comment
-
There are two purposes of path handling in url_to_fs:
The latter point differs by filesystem. You notice, for instance, that localFS converts everything to posix-like, and may behave unexpectedly when the input is semi-posix on windows. HTTP-fs requires that the protocol be retained (because http and https are different), but most implementations drop the protocol. Also, if you has complex URLs like chains (simplecache::s3://bucket/file) or embedded parameters (ssh://user:pass@host:22/path/file) you would find only the "path" is returned, the rest having become arguments to the implementation class. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Why does the format of the path, returned by
url_to_fs
is so inconsistent depending on the file system and url format?And the output is:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions