You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 29, 2024. It is now read-only.
I was first thinking of writing a long issue detailing the history on how I tried to extend @glimmerx/@glimmer to make it work like ember.js by just using node.js/typescript standards(without any babel addons, not even the babel typescript addon), however it would be too long so instead I'll summarize the issue here:
Glimmer compiler is currently coupled with babel, cannot be used in node.js without a very custom, specific and "error-prone during customization" build process. In other words the current low-level API of glimmer is not low-level enough and implicitly assumes many things to be set up, that is not declared explicitly in the end-user code, has to be implicitly built/set up when developer wants to do his:
import{precompileTemplate,setComponentTemplate}from'@glimmer/core';import{on}from'@glimmer/modifier';setComponentTemplate(precompileTemplate(templateString,// NOTE: current babel transpiler throws a buggy exception when this is not an absolute template string(i.e instead its a variable that holds a string){strictMode: true,scope: ()=>{return{ on };},}),MyComponent);
I was very happy when I saw the new @glimmer package has the low-level api to declare scopes, and in practice thats all we should need for in-browser compilation or for precompilation really. Ideally setComponentTemplate should output the glimmer op-code or custom data structure for use in the mounting API(renderComponent).
However this is not how it works now, there is more implicit build step executions happening that makes the low-level api, not low-level enough yet and ties the developer experience to a custom build process that cannot be even reproduced easily in a stable fashion. Each release of these custom npm babel build packages in addition to their configuration in babel and webpack, introduces a potential for a buggy release/update. Only after we have a reliable standalone compiler that can be run in the cli or in the node.js environment(node.js, ts-node or deno) we can effectively experiment and build on top of glimmer.
They introduce both node.js API and cli, esbuild does the same. We should do the same, we can add our learnings to the option object/customization of the compiler function(scope, services, args, trackedComponentDefinition inside the options object or cli flags).
Current bug in the npm package/release @glimmer/core@v2.0.0-beta.16
The distributed @glimmer/core package.json points to:
node_modules/@glimmer/core/dist/commonjs/src/template.js#3 is exports.precompileTemplate = void 0; node_modules/@glimmer/core/dist/modules/src/template.js#3 is export let precompileTemplate;;
In other words, @glimmer/core is currently unusable in node.js
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
I was first thinking of writing a long issue detailing the history on how I tried to extend
@glimmerx
/@glimmer
to make it work like ember.js by just using node.js/typescript standards(without any babel addons, not even the babel typescript addon), however it would be too long so instead I'll summarize the issue here:I was very happy when I saw the new
@glimmer
package has the low-level api to declarescope
s, and in practice thats all we should need forin-browser
compilation or forprecompilation
really. IdeallysetComponentTemplate
should output the glimmer op-code or custom data structure for use in the mounting API(renderComponent
).However this is not how it works now, there is more implicit build step executions happening that makes the low-level api, not low-level enough yet and ties the developer experience to a custom build process that cannot be even reproduced easily in a stable fashion. Each release of these custom npm babel build packages in addition to their configuration in babel and webpack, introduces a potential for a buggy release/update. Only after we have a reliable standalone compiler that can be run in the cli or in the node.js environment(node.js, ts-node or deno) we can effectively experiment and build on top of glimmer.
Riot.js does this really well in their compiler tools: https://riot.js.org/compiler/#in-browser-compilation-with-inline-templates
They introduce both node.js API and cli,
esbuild
does the same. We should do the same, we can add our learnings to the option object/customization of the compiler function(scope
,services
,args
,trackedComponentDefinition
inside the options object or cli flags).Current bug in the npm package/release @glimmer/core@v2.0.0-beta.16
The distributed @glimmer/core package.json points to:
node_modules/@glimmer/core/dist/commonjs/src/template.js#3
isexports.precompileTemplate = void 0;
node_modules/@glimmer/core/dist/modules/src/template.js#3
isexport let precompileTemplate;
;In other words, @glimmer/core is currently unusable in node.js
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: