Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use global DEM instead of or in addition to SRTM #2

Open
dittaeva opened this issue Aug 9, 2012 · 4 comments
Open

Use global DEM instead of or in addition to SRTM #2

dittaeva opened this issue Aug 9, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@dittaeva
Copy link

dittaeva commented Aug 9, 2012

SRTM is limited to area between 60 deg. north and 58 deg. south. What about:

  1. ASTER v2: Covers almost the whole world with high 30 metres resolution, but there are still some issues with anomalies and voids. Used successfully by turkompisen.no. Limits on distribution of original data, no limits on use and distribution on derived data that cannot be converted back to original data.
  2. GMTED2010: Only one with worldwide coverage, good accuracy and quality, but best resolution is 7.5 arc-seconds (~232 m). Should be public domain. Suitable for routes of several km, but not good for (at least) sub-1 km routes.
@grundid
Copy link
Owner

grundid commented Aug 9, 2012

Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't know the other sources besides SRTM.

How would you like to proceed? Would you like to contribute some patches?

@dittaeva
Copy link
Author

I'd love to, but that is beyond my abilities and time at the moment. If you have questions about how turkompisen.no has used the ASTER data you could ask espen at espenpost dot com, with the right format (similar to SRTM) I suppose it wouldn't take that much effort?

@grundid
Copy link
Owner

grundid commented Aug 14, 2012

If the format is the same as with SRTM then you're right. I would have to check how to get the data first.

As for now I'll leave this issue open.

@dittaeva
Copy link
Author

Looks like they aren't the same, but these links could be helpful in converting to SRTM format:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants