Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add test suite #7

Open
jpoly1219 opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add test suite #7

jpoly1219 opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jpoly1219
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jpoly1219
Copy link
Contributor

jpoly1219 commented Feb 14, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Currently, users must manually test their implementations by interacting with the web UI. A test suite to test user implementations would be a nice touch.

Confirmed and requested by Dr. Omar.
@jpoly1219 jpoly1219 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 14, 2024
@jpoly1219 jpoly1219 self-assigned this Feb 14, 2024
cyrus- added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2024
@cyrus-
Merge pull request #8 from hazelgrove/feature-test
6f271ea 
#7: Proof of concept for the test suite
@cyrus-
Copy link
Member

cyrus- commented Feb 22, 2024

Testing infrastructure now available tdue to #8, but still need to add a more thorough test suite covering all of the judgements in the paper. Tests should be written to avoid the common mistake students make of only handling the value forms in the subexpressions, e.g. testing Plus(NumLit(2), NumLit(2)) isn't as good as testing Plus(Plus(NumLit(2), NumLit(3)), Plus(NumLit(4), NumLit(5)).

@jpoly1219 jpoly1219 mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2024
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jpoly1219 jpoly1219

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cyrus- @jpoly1219