You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We will aim to improve the automation grade of the overall pipeline, including the generation in the CAD of the intermediate steps (e.g., simreps, shrinkwraps, mounted mechanisms). Other possibilities may include the modification of the intermediate deliveries (e.g., adding a missing frame to existing shrinkwrap) instead of starting over from the original CAD model.
I was thinking that it may be beneficial for this package and the community, more broadly, to share the user experience of our beta testers.
Do you reckon we could foresee, in the context of MVP-5, organizing a session with AMI (cc @traversaro) so that they can show us how they've been employing our toolchain and the potential upsides compared with the past?
This user story can be eventually refined and published along with the documentation.
As per #1 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: