Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi @nikitn2, thanks for raising these! I'm certainly very pro that perspective and would love to see implementations for both of these in I don't have any immediate projects that involve either of these things however, so am unlikely to be a major part of implementing them myself any time soon. Of course, it would be great if you wanted to contribute them, and I'd be happy to review and discuss etc. Maybe we could start an issue for each to see what features are possible and how an API might look? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi Johnnie,
I don't know if you're following iTensor, but it appears they are taking the view there that TNs are a general linear algebra tool that can be employed well beyond quantum physics/computing (like for instance solving PDEs or Machine Learning). To accommodate this, they've added some very nice functionality in their iTensor library:
Do you think it might be worthwhile to implement this in quimb? It would make it easier to use quimb as a generic TN platform for solving high-dimensional problems.
Would be happy to work together with you on this, if you'd want :)
Thank you for all your work on quimb – I love it!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions