You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the package is currently built for three specific platforms. However, building Larch as a noarch package (is it even possible?) would make it more accessible to users on different platforms (cry in Mac ARM64 😢) and simplify the build process. Also, this would allow Mac ARM64 users to use ActivitySim's dev environment to create a new environment, currently we cannot do this because Larch doesn't have a Mac ARM64 build on Conda.
Please let me know if you are open to supporting noarch build and release. I would be happy to contribute by opening a pull request with the necessary modifications.
Thanks :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am perfectly happy to see Larch on conda as noarch. However, I understand this is not currently possible as Larch v5 includes compiled extension modules. It does build on Linux and I expect a Mac ARM build should be easy to add if you would like to try that.
Hello @jpn--,
I noticed that the package is currently built for three specific platforms. However, building Larch as a noarch package (is it even possible?) would make it more accessible to users on different platforms (cry in Mac ARM64 😢) and simplify the build process. Also, this would allow Mac ARM64 users to use ActivitySim's dev environment to create a new environment, currently we cannot do this because Larch doesn't have a Mac ARM64 build on Conda.
Please let me know if you are open to supporting noarch build and release. I would be happy to contribute by opening a pull request with the necessary modifications.
Thanks :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: