Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve header formatting #157

Open
Zethson opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Improve header formatting #157

Zethson opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Zethson
Copy link
Member

Zethson commented Jul 13, 2022

From the docs image

50% of the success is visuals :)

  1. Consider using a Rich table maybe? It is "bigger" but looks more professional. See below for argument against this.
  2. Generally, color might be nice.
  3. The dependencies must be formatted more nicely. One dependency per row to more easily digest the information
  4. Argument against Rich tables: They cannot be properly collapsed. Consider using HTML formatting to allow for the interactive selection and hiding of information.
@falexwolf
Copy link
Member

Thanks, Lukas! This is valuable feedback! We'll consider, and I'd also really like to discuss.

Rationale for dependency formatting is having them copy-pastable into a pip install .... If we do it in any other way, that won't be the case anymore. They're alphabetically sorted, and they're not meant to explode but represent the key dependencies the analyst deems crucial for the result of the notebook.

I have a quite strong opinion of keeping them in one row until things get fancier an interactive. But I'm also happy to re-think that opinion!

@Zethson
Copy link
Member Author

Zethson commented Jul 13, 2022

You also have a command to export them to a requirements.txt file, which in turn is pip installable. This covers your use-case for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants