You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Has anyone verified/validated the output for the dissolved organic carbon isotope/radiocarbon model (marbl_ciso)?
In my 20-yr average, mapping of DO13C (CISO_DOCtot_d13C) at 5 m and 3000 m depth (z_t=1 and 51) , the range should be between -20 to -30 per mil, but I am getting 0 to -10 per mil mostly.
While DO14C (CISO_DOCtot_d14C) is simulating younger in the deep ocean than the top surface ocean. DO14C in the deep ocean should also be simulating depleted -400 to -500 per mil. Is the model simulation output correct for the model parameters?
DO13C 5 meter
DO13C 3000 meter
DO14C 5 meter
DO14C 3000 meter
Equation within marbl_ciso_interior_tendency_mod.F90 question:
Starting on line 532 of marbl_ciso_interior_tendency_mod.F90 for "Calculate oceanic D14C and D13C of carbon pools" is the tracer values to calculate per mille notation for DI13C, DI14C, DO13C, and DO14C. Are the parenthesis for the equation using the correct PEMDAS for calculating per mille? Should there be sub-brackets around the ratios of 13C/std before subtracting 1?
Has anyone verified/validated the output for the dissolved organic carbon isotope/radiocarbon model (marbl_ciso)?
In my 20-yr average, mapping of DO13C (CISO_DOCtot_d13C) at 5 m and 3000 m depth (z_t=1 and 51) , the range should be between -20 to -30 per mil, but I am getting 0 to -10 per mil mostly.
While DO14C (CISO_DOCtot_d14C) is simulating younger in the deep ocean than the top surface ocean. DO14C in the deep ocean should also be simulating depleted -400 to -500 per mil. Is the model simulation output correct for the model parameters?
DO13C 5 meter
DO13C 3000 meter
DO14C 5 meter
DO14C 3000 meter
Equation within marbl_ciso_interior_tendency_mod.F90 question:
Starting on line 532 of marbl_ciso_interior_tendency_mod.F90 for "Calculate oceanic D14C and D13C of carbon pools" is the tracer values to calculate per mille notation for DI13C, DI14C, DO13C, and DO14C. Are the parenthesis for the equation using the correct PEMDAS for calculating per mille? Should there be sub-brackets around the ratios of 13C/std before subtracting 1?
Code on line 532:
DIC_d13C(k) = ( R13C_DIC(k) / R13C_std - c1 ) * c1000
DIC_d14C(k) = ( R14C_DIC(k) / R14C_std - c1 ) * c1000
Proposed code:
DIC_d13C(k) = ( (R13C_DIC(k) / R13C_std) - c1 ) * c1000
DIC_d14C(k) = ( (R14C_DIC(k) / R14C_std) - c1 ) * c1000
It should be noted that my model is unable to build the case with the updated parentheses.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: