Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better naming convention for files in driver_src/ #439

Open
mnlevy1981 opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Better naming convention for files in driver_src/ #439

mnlevy1981 opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mnlevy1981
Copy link
Collaborator

Using the marbl_ prefix for the stand-alone driver designed for testing is a little confusing; it's unclear what subroutines called from the driver are in the MARBL library rather than the driver itself. @klindsay28 and I discussed this, and a better approach would be to use driver_ instead of marbl_ for the driver; modules like marbl_init_drv.F90 should either be driver_init.F90 or driver_init_test.F90 (I'm leaning towards the former).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mnlevy1981