gather community/leadership input regarding the textual annotations involved in study/consortium

[turbomam]

• Issue1097 study consortia #1098

We can merge this PR now and change it's textual annotations (mappings, labels, etc.)later without a migration. @emileyfadrosh @mslarae13 @lamccue

After populating the study_category for all Studys in MngoDB, we can switch that to a required slot, and s migration shouldn't be required.

However, it will become necessary for the Submission Portal to ask whether the thing that is being submitted is a more like a study or more like a consortium. @jeffbaumes @naglepuff @marySalvi

[mslarae13]

We chatted about this in the study page squad. My suggestion, we assume a study is a study and any consortiums or umbrella studies we want to add, we'll evaluate on a case by case basis for now.

Implementing this language into the submission portal now is likely to confuse the community and we should popularize it first.

Leave this issue open, as a reminder for when we're ready to tackle identifying study type on the submission portal. Until then, backlog.