Taking a dependency on cxplat only

[nigriMSFT]

I am working in a repository that now has a need for a cxplat abstraction very similar to what is provided in this repository. My usage only needs support for Windows user mode and Windows kernel mode, as the project is scoped to Windows.

Is taking a dependency on this usersim repository only for the cxplat facilities it provides a good/reasonable idea?

Another route we can take is to copy cxplat facilities from usersim or msquic, but I'd really hope to not create yet another Windows cxplat library.

There is also cxplat, are/were there plans to make this a centralized cxplat facility?

[nibanks]

The goal is that cxplat would be the place for cross-platform abstraction, and everything would depend on it. But since that requires quite a bit of work, and we haven't had a lot of justification for it, we haven't gotten there yet.

[nigriMSFT]

Thanks for the context!