Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Communication Topology : point to point data flow is missing ? #42

Open
Qinghe12 opened this issue Mar 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Communication Topology : point to point data flow is missing ? #42

Qinghe12 opened this issue Mar 19, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Qinghe12
Copy link

I use IPM-2.0.6 to stat MPI communication behavior while Communication Topology is missing when ipm_parse to html ?

@Qinghe12 Qinghe12 changed the title Communication Topology : point to point data flow is mossing ? Communication Topology : point to point data flow is missing ? Mar 19, 2021
@njwright
Copy link
Collaborator

njwright commented Mar 19, 2021 via email

@Qinghe12
Copy link
Author

Qinghe12 commented Mar 22, 2021

@njwright I'm sorry to say that Using flag -force-topology can't solve it.

I found that Communication Topology module consists of some item in index.html as following:

align=left bgcolor=lightblue
a name="ct"
Communication Topology : point to point data flow
.....
img src="img/mpi_topo_data_tot.png"
....
....
href="img/mpi_topo_data_send.png"data sent
href="img/mpi_topo_data_recv.png"data recv
href="img/mpi_topo_time.png"time spent
href="map_data.txt">map_data file
href="map_adjacency.txt">map_adjacency file
...

only mpi_topo_time.png can be found in img directory While other img missing.
when index.html opened, the Communication Topology shows none

@ehermann
Copy link

ehermann commented Mar 1, 2023

Hello @Qinghe12,
to have the Communication Topology plot you must use the C ipm_parser that is only built with --enable-parser. Otherwise it’s the perl parser that is placed in the installation folder.
You will also need mxml https://github.com/michaelrsweet/mxml. The latest version didn't work for me, I used v2.11 instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants