Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to turn off strike thru with check boxes #5033

Closed
Gobytego opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Option to turn off strike thru with check boxes #5033

Gobytego opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Gobytego
Copy link

How to use GitHub

  • Please use the 👍 reaction to show that you are affected by the same issue.
  • Please don't comment if you have no relevant information to add. It's just extra noise for everyone subscribed to this issue.
  • Subscribe to receive notifications on status change and new comments.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This started with new update

Describe the solution you'd like
An option to turn off strike thru with check boxes

Describe alternatives you've considered
maybe have a separate checkbox with strike thru

Additional context
most of our guys get confused because we used to use strike thru's for items we did not need and we use check boxes to show completed items... having the checkbox also do a strike thru causes confusion.

@juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

juliusknorr commented Aug 18, 2023

This has been an upstream design decision in the text editor in nextcloud/text#2724 and we won't add a config flag just for that.

However you could of course apply some custom css using https://github.com/nextcloud/theming_customcss to change this to your preference. The following rule should work for that:

div.ProseMirror .checkbox-item.checked label {
	text-decoration: none !important;
}

@juliusknorr juliusknorr closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 18, 2023
@Gobytego
Copy link
Author

We do not want to implement the custom CSS.

@Gobytego
Copy link
Author

thank you this worked

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants