[PRE REVIEW]: Sigma: Uncertainty Propagation for C++

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @jwaldrop107 (Jonathan Waldrop)
Repository: https://github.com/QCUncertainty/sigma
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper
Version: v0.1
Editor: @vissarion
Reviewers: @baxmittens, @YehorYudinIPP
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/46af69c48a681200c40fb5a9cebc6168"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/46af69c48a681200c40fb5a9cebc6168/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/46af69c48a681200c40fb5a9cebc6168/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/46af69c48a681200c40fb5a9cebc6168)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jwaldrop107. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jwaldrop107 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (2356.9 files/s, 178500.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             17            133             10           1041
C/C++ Header                    14            161            891            432
Markdown                         4             53              0            418
YAML                             3              7             17            187
CMake                            8             36             29            170
TeX                              1              4              0             46
HTML                             1              3             19             45
CSS                              1              1              2              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            49            398            968           2345
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    86	Jonathan M. Waldrop
     1	Ryan Richard

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1063/5.0196384 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Uncertainty propagation with functionally correlat...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Uncertainties: a Python package for calculations w...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CMake
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Eigen

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1064

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

MUQ: The MIT Uncertainty Quantification Library
Submitting author: @mparno
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @martinmodrak, @georgiastuart
Similarity score: 0.7047

Grama: A Grammar of Model Analysis
Submitting author: @zdelrosario
Handling editor: @mjsottile (Retired)
Reviewers: @BastinRobin, @rodrigokataishi
Similarity score: 0.7025

PyThia: A Python package for Uncertainty Quantification based on non-intrusive polynomial chaos expansions
Submitting author: @Nando-Farchmin
Handling editor: @vissarion (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @timokoch
Similarity score: 0.7014

UM-Bridge: Uncertainty quantification and modeling bridge
Submitting author: @linusseelinger
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @georgiastuart, @Himscipy
Similarity score: 0.6948

NoisySignalIntegration.jl: A Julia package for uncertainty evaluation of numeric integrals
Submitting author: @nluetts
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @myousefi2016, @mseri
Similarity score: 0.6937

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[editorialbot]

Hello @robertjyates, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[crvernon]

@editorialbot invite @vissarion as editor

👋 @vissarion can you take this one on as editor?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @vissarion is now the editor

[vissarion]

👋 @dannys4, @baxmittens, @YehorYudinIPP, @shahmoradi would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[baxmittens]

Sounds interesting. I would do it if you like.

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @baxmittens as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@baxmittens added to the reviewers list!

[YehorYudinIPP]

Hi! I would like to join as a reviewer as well.

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @YehorYudinIPP as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@YehorYudinIPP added to the reviewers list!

[vissarion]

Thanks @YehorYudinIPP and @baxmittens for your quick responses!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7404.