We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This is a regression in v5.0.0 caused by #156
Previously, types without generic type params were rendered as expected, without any <> type params list:
<>
Now, they often include an extraneous & unnecessary empty type params list, which can mislead users to believe that the type is generic:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
adidahiya
No branches or pull requests
This is a regression in v5.0.0 caused by #156
Previously, types without generic type params were rendered as expected, without any
<>
type params list:Now, they often include an extraneous & unnecessary empty type params list, which can mislead users to believe that the type is generic:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: