You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just a reminder that eventually we should get those tools working -- at some point we want to be able to show them to people on a visual rather than a code level as grant products (presumably before we write the next grant). The CSV we generate now can be loaded up and displays date-ranges and authority dates effectively in Palladio, but we're missing the spatial component (probably has to be lat/lon centroid for polygons). Were we going to try to set up our own visualization page with Blocks, in the end?
This is driven in part by the Timeline Consortium meeting I just attended. They're working out their own standard for the representation of temporal data, which I think will be at least partially compatible with what we have (though not without mapping), and they're starting to struggle with the spatial component (which has to include space, in the planets and stars and galaxies sense, so is a little more tricky). It would be helpful to give them a sense of the formats we're outputting for spatiotemporal visualization, I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a reminder that eventually we should get those tools working -- at some point we want to be able to show them to people on a visual rather than a code level as grant products (presumably before we write the next grant). The CSV we generate now can be loaded up and displays date-ranges and authority dates effectively in Palladio, but we're missing the spatial component (probably has to be lat/lon centroid for polygons). Were we going to try to set up our own visualization page with Blocks, in the end?
This is driven in part by the Timeline Consortium meeting I just attended. They're working out their own standard for the representation of temporal data, which I think will be at least partially compatible with what we have (though not without mapping), and they're starting to struggle with the spatial component (which has to include space, in the planets and stars and galaxies sense, so is a little more tricky). It would be helpful to give them a sense of the formats we're outputting for spatiotemporal visualization, I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: