Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug: in Debian Bullseye VM in docker january says 'GLIBC_2.29 not found required by ./january' #72

Closed
accessiblepixel opened this issue Dec 10, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@accessiblepixel
Copy link

What happened?

Expected all containers to launch after following instructions from self-hosted repo.

I am running a Debian Bullseye VM in KVM/QEMU with CPU type 'max' (for x86x64_v2 support which appears required by the application). The rest of the containers launch successfully but the january container doesn't launch. Getting the logs it says:
./january: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./january)
./january: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./january)

VM Info:
2 vCPU (Set to type 'max')
2GB RAM
32GB Disk

OS: Debian Version 11.8

Docker Info:
Docker Version: 20.10.5+dsfg1, build 55c4c88
Docker-Compose version: 1.25.0

Please let me know if you need me to provide anything else, and if I have posted this in the wrong place I'm still getting accustomed to github. <3

Any pointers would be appreciated.

@accessiblepixel accessiblepixel added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 10, 2023
@typicalaimster
Copy link

Looks like editing the docker-compose file and pulling the tag january:0.3.5 worked for me. Something is up with January's master build.

@4kh00
Copy link

4kh00 commented Jan 19, 2024

On my local machine, this bug is happening. @typicalaimster's solution works with no side effects afaik.

@prologic
Copy link

This is fixed by revoltchat/january#39

@accessiblepixel
Copy link
Author

Awesome! Well feel free to close the issue once the pull has been reviewed/accepted (I think that's the right terminology) :)

Haven't had chance to test myself, but everyone's help has been appreciated and glad you were able to work it out ❤️

@insertish
Copy link
Member

Fixed in build january:0.3.5-2, also matches :master and :latest tags so you can just pull it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants