You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for this really nice tool! I was wondering if there are any recommendations for filtering tumor variants after they are annotated. It has been suggested by a colleague to filter any variants where DGv_Name-DGv_VarType-site1 and DGv_Name-DGv_VarType-site2 match exactly, but I have seen places where the one is only a partial string match of the other, and i'm not sure what to do in the case of more complex annotations, for example:
The string nsv7177-Inversion<=>nsv829649-Loss is in both, but the first column contains: nsv870829-Gain<=> in addition. I'm not sure how to interpret the values when they contain <=>.
If there's any other way we could filter using the annotations from this tool, we would definitely love to know!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for this really nice tool! I was wondering if there are any recommendations for filtering tumor variants after they are annotated. It has been suggested by a colleague to filter any variants where
DGv_Name-DGv_VarType-site1
andDGv_Name-DGv_VarType-site2
match exactly, but I have seen places where the one is only a partial string match of the other, and i'm not sure what to do in the case of more complex annotations, for example:The string
nsv7177-Inversion<=>nsv829649-Loss
is in both, but the first column contains:nsv870829-Gain<=>
in addition. I'm not sure how to interpret the values when they contain<=>
.If there's any other way we could filter using the annotations from this tool, we would definitely love to know!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: