Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RVM: Zalrsc should be a valid optional extension #164

Open
ubc-guy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

RVM: Zalrsc should be a valid optional extension #164

ubc-guy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ubc-guy
Copy link
Contributor

ubc-guy commented Apr 26, 2024

RVM lists both A and Zaamo as valid optional extensions.

A = Zaamo + Zalrsc

it only makes sense that since A and Zaamo are optional, that Zalrsc can also be optional on its own.

Zaamo = easy to implement on simple cacheless microcontrollers (and doesn't need Zalrsc)

Zalrsc = might be easier to implement on high-performance multi-core cached microcontrollers (and doesn't need Zaamo)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants