-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
CombinationSum.java
85 lines (78 loc) · 2.66 KB
/
CombinationSum.java
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
// Link: https://leetcode.com/problems/combination-sum/
// DFS
// 4ms, 52.65%
class Solution {
public List<List<Integer>> combinationSum(int[] candidates, int target) {
List<List<Integer>> ans = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> cur = new ArrayList<>();
dfs(candidates, target, 0, ans,cur);
return ans;
}
private void dfs (int[] candidates, int target, int startIdx, List<List<Integer>> ans, List<Integer> cur) {
if (target == 0) {
ans.add(new ArrayList<>(cur));
return;
}
if (target < 0) {
return;
}
for (int i = startIdx; i < candidates.length; ++i) {
cur.add(candidates[i]);
dfs(candidates, target - candidates[i], i, ans, cur);
cur.remove(cur.size() - 1);
}
}
}
/*
* Time complexity: O(N^target), N is the length of candidates
* This is a very loose upper bound. In the worst case, the smallest number in candidates is 1, so the height
* of the recursion tree is the value of target. The fan-out of each node is upper bounded by the length of
* candidates, say N (actually, the fan-out of the nodes are decreasing from left to right). So the total
* number of nodes in the recursion tree is O(N^target).
*
* Space complexity: O(target) for the recursion stack
*
* Notes:
* How to avoid duplicate combinations?
* a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + ... + a_n = target. If a_1 is candidates[0], a_2 is candidates[4], when enumerate a_3, we
* start from candidates[4] instead of candidates[0].
*/
// Method2: Improved way
// 2ms, 98.4%
// We sort the candidates array first so that we can terminate the recursion earier. If
// candidates[i] is larger than the target remaining, no need to continue to try all
// the other elements after i.
class Solution {
public List<List<Integer>> combinationSum(int[] candidates, int target) {
Arrays.sort(candidates);
List<List<Integer>> ans = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> cur = new ArrayList<>();
dfs(candidates, target, 0, ans, cur);
return ans;
}
private void dfs(int[] candidates, int target, int startIdx, List<List<Integer>> ans, List<Integer> cur) {
if (target == 0) {
ans.add(new ArrayList<>(cur));
return;
}
for (int i = startIdx; i < candidates.length; ++i) {
if (candidates[i] <= target) {
cur.add(candidates[i]);
dfs(candidates, target - candidates[i], i, ans ,cur);
cur.remove(cur.size() - 1);
} else {
return;
}
}
}
}
/*
* Time complexity: O(N^target)
* The same with the first method. It's a very loose upper bound. But we have a good pruning in this method so the
* actual runtime is less.
*
* Space complexity: O(target)
*
* Notes:
* Sort the array for pruning.
*/